RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING AND CREDIT TRANSFER POLICY AND PROCEDURE
PURPOSE
To provide formal, fair, equitable, consistent, and transparent processes for the recognition of prior learning/current competency in compliance with the Education and Training Act 2020 and to formalise policy and process in relation to Credit Transfer, Cross-Crediting, or Articulation Agreements.
POLICY
VHNZ RPL/CRT policy is compatible with the NZQA position to ensure that the award of credit for parts of any course which may in future contain NZQA unit or skill standards, will be formally recognised on an individual’s ‘Record of Achievement’.
Credit transfer and cross-crediting arrangements must be defensible in terms of appropriateness and equity. Recorded credit transfer and cross-crediting arrangements will provide precedent for future decisions.
Articulation agreements must be formally documented, signed by the CEO (or delegate), and stored centrally.
Learners must receive timely advice on credit transfer, cross-crediting, and articulation opportunities.
Rules regarding cross-credit and credit transfer must be stated in the programme regulations.
For additional information and reference, those awarding RPL/CRT should refer to NZQA “Guidelines for the recognition and award of credit for learning”, available on the NZQA website.
PROCEDURE
Recognition of Prior Learning
RPL will be available only to those enrolled on VHNZ courses. Enrolment does not necessarily mean taking up a learner place on the course.
Any programme-specific rules regarding recognition or prior learning/current competency will be stated in the programme regulations.
RPL is assessed using more than one process and is evidence based. In all cases, the purpose of RPL will be to provide authentic, valid, reliable, and sufficient evidence of the applicant’s current competence.
Applicants must apply for RPL in writing, using the VHNZ RPL Application Form, providing suitable evidence of how, when and where learning was previously achieved. The evidence will be assessed by relevant training sponsors who may either accept the initial evidence and approve the application for RPL or require the applicant to undertake further written or practical assessment to determine their ‘Current Competency’.
To safeguard the quality of qualifications for which RPL is sought, no APL will be considered for components of a programme that VHNZ considers to be essential to the course, micro-credential, programme award or qualification. The Chief Academic Officer may waive this under exceptional circumstances.
No partial credit will be given for unit/skill standards, courses, or modules. Only whole unit/skill standards and all the learning outcomes of a particular course or module will be considered for RPL.
The Chief Academic Officer will consider any APL application for a qualification from a tutor.
RPL will be granted at the highest level consistent with the learner’s demonstrated level of competence.
Any qualification awarded because of RPL will be regarded as being equal to that gained by completing all the standards within the entire course or programme.
In establishing procedures for the recognition of prior learning, the following principles will be borne in mind:
- The overriding principle in recognising prior learning is that if an applicant can satisfactorily demonstrate that they already have the specific knowledge/skills/abilities required in a unit, then credit for that unit should be awarded.
- Focus will be on specific learning outcomes of units registered on the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework, rather than on general life experiences.
- Assessments of prior learning will be made by qualified assessors. These are usually tutorial staff within the Programme Area delivering the Course where RPL is being sought.
- Assessment methods will be flexible to allow for a range of techniques responsive to cultural, gender, age, ability, and other issues.
Applying for recognition of prior learning is an option available to applicants; it is not a requirement.
The three methods of demonstrating prior learning that may be used at VHNZ are:
- Attestation,
- Challenge
- Portfolio.
The method/s chosen will be after discussion between the applicant and the Chief Academic Officer (or delegate).
Should there be any dispute, or doubt, as to the most appropriate method to be used in any given case, the Chief Academic Officer will determine the methodology.
RPL methods chosen will be appropriate for the topic concerned and appropriate for the applicant’s cultural background, gender, age, and ability.
Method One: Attestation
The attestation process involves a meeting between two groups of people - an "attesting" group and an "assessing" group. The purpose of the meeting is to submit and match the applicant's prior learning with the learning outcomes of a unit or units registered on the NZQCF. The applicant can choose whether to be present or not at the attestation meeting.
The attesting group is selected by the applicant and should include authoritative people (e.g. SMEs) in the unit for which credit is sought.
This largely oral process is one by which an applicant applies to have their earlier life and work experiences matched against the learning outcomes of a unit/skill standard registered on the NZQCF.
An attesting group is a group of people who can vouch for, confirm, or attest that the applicant has the competencies/skills/attitudes required in the learning outcomes of the units applied for.
The assessing group is the group that meets with the Attesting group and has the responsibility for making recommendations on the amount and level of credit to be awarded. Clearly the Assessing group must have the appropriate skills and background in the relevant areas.
Method Two: Challenge assessment
The process by which an applicant wishing to have prior learning recognised, demonstrates relevant knowledge, skills, or abilities. This may involve a practical, oral, or written assessment.
In addition to the normal information relating to the RPL application, (e.g. copies of course descriptions), the applicant may receive assistance in preparation for challenge assessments. This could include:
- Advice on preparation for examinations
- Copies of earlier examinations or samples of representative questions.
Method Three: Portfolio Assessment
A collection of material or information, assembled in an approved format, as evidence of knowledge, skills and attributes that may be credited towards a unit/skill standard registered on the NZQCF.
In this context it is used to describe the portfolio or file in which an applicant will present all the details and evidence necessary for their prior learning to be assessed.
Credit Recognition and Transfer
CRT is based on formal learning outcomes already achieved by a learner through previous study. The purpose of CRT is to provide authentic, valid, reliable, and sufficient evidence of the applicant’s achievement of comparable outcomes.
CRT involves the matching of knowledge skills or abilities already acquired against the specific learning outcomes of a unit or skill standard for which credit is sought.
All CRT applications, assessments, and decisions will be documented and stored in the programme file in accordance with VHNZ’s Quality Management System (QMS).
Any programme-specific rules regarding CRT will be stated in the programme regulations.
CRT will be available only to those enrolled on VHNZ courses. Enrolment does not necessarily mean taking up a learner place on the course.
When the student wishes to use an equivalent qualification, the student must apply in writing.
- Applicants must apply for CRT by submitting verified documentation such as official academic transcripts, Record of Achievement (ROA), or certificates. The documentation must clearly identify the qualification, programme, components, and assessment standards achieved.
- The Chief Academic Officer (or delegate) must sight the Record of Achievement from NZQA (if applicable). (Note academic transcripts from other providers do not guarantee that the unit has been registered with NZQA.)
- The Chief Academic Officer (or delegate) will review the documentation to determine if the outcomes achieved are equivalent either wholly, or in part, to the outcomes for which credit is being sought.
- If the CRT application is unsuccessful, the applicant will be informed of the decision and the reasons. The applicant may appeal the decision through the VHNZ appeals process.
- If the CRT application is successful, the credit will be recorded on the learner’s academic record. Where applicable, the grade achieved in the original study will be transferred at the same value.
- If the documentation is insufficient, the applicant may be asked to provide further evidence or apply using another method such as portfolio, challenge, or attestation.
VHNZ may:
- Request information directly from that provider, or indirectly through the applicant/learner, on the unit or units, (e.g. contents, learning outcomes, assessment methods, reading lists, etc.), to assist in the decision-making process.
- Request the applicant to apply using one or more of the other methods, (portfolio, challenge or attestation), of recognising prior learning. This option is likely to be used where there is insufficient evidence available about the unit(s) for which credit is being sought.
This page was updated: Sept 2025